Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7817803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T06:21:51+00:00 2026-06-02T06:21:51+00:00

I have a member function that doesn’t throw anything so i appended the throw()

  • 0

I have a member function that doesn’t throw anything so i appended the throw() suffix to the end of it, indicating that it won’t throw any exceptions.

My question is, in the function I make use of several std::string, and lets say something goes wrong in the initialization of the std::string, and it throws bad_alloc or out_of_range (or what ever else can go wrong with a std::string).

Is it still safe to still add the throw() suffix?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T06:21:54+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 6:21 am

    Herb Sutter says that

    exception specifications confer a lot less benefit than they’re worth

    It can cause more problems than bring benefits. So, you should think twise before doing that.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have class with a member function that takes a default argument. struct Class
I have a template class with a variadic template member function that I am
I have a member function in a class that has a callback, but the
I have a function inside a class that returns a reference to a member
In F# I have a function that returns System.Linq.Expression instances: and System.Object with member
I have a template member function with this signature: template<typename T> void sync(void (*work)(T*),
I have an inline member function defined under class MyClass int MyClass::myInlineFunction(); This function
I wonder if it is a good practice to have a member template function
I have a class ( EAGLView ) which calls a member function of a
Imagine I have a class Window with a member function show which causes the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.