Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 265813
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T22:48:08+00:00 2026-05-11T22:48:08+00:00

I have a Mercurial repository set up on a Linux server, and some (but

  • 0

I have a Mercurial repository set up on a Linux server, and some (but not all) users have permission to push to it. They connect to the repository over ssh.

These users are members of a unix group together. Below is the script I’m using to alter a repository to allow it to receive pushes from them.

Can this be improved? Are there unnecessary operations in here? Is anything bad style for a bash script?

#!/bin/bash                                                                     

if [[ $# -lt 2 ]]; then
    echo Usage: $0 directory groupname
    exit 1
fi

if ! chown -R :$2 $1; then
    echo chown failure
    exit 2
fi

if ! find $1/.hg -type d -exec chmod g+s {} \;; then
    echo chmod failure
    exit 3
fi

if ! find $1 -perm -u+r -exec chmod g+r {} \;; then
    echo chmod failure 2
    exit 4
fi

if ! find $1 -perm -u+w -exec chmod g+w {} \;; then
    echo chmod failure 3
    exit 5
fi

if ! find $1 -perm -u+x -exec chmod g+x {} \;; then
    echo chmod failure 4
    exit 6
fi
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T22:48:08+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 10:48 pm

    Running find with -exec launches a separate chown process for each file. You’ll get a lot less process thrash (and more speed) if you do:

    find "$1"/.hg -type d -print0 | xargs chmod g+s
    find "$1" -perm -u+r -print0 | xargs chmod g+r
    find "$1" -perm -u+w -print0 | xargs chmod g+w
    find "$1" -perm -u+x -print0 | xargs chmod g+x
    

    As an aside, have you looked at Mercurial’s ACL Extension in combination with hg-ssh? So long as the only access is ssh, it does the same sort of thing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 127k
  • Answers 127k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer In this case you would need to pop back to… May 12, 2026 at 5:32 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer In my opinion it's the relying party itself should be… May 12, 2026 at 5:32 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Multiple requests do share the same static data. The only… May 12, 2026 at 5:32 am

Related Questions

I have been creating a website with Ruby on Rails, and will be hosting
I'm currently working in a team where we're using a subversion repository. I say
We are currently using VSS for version control. Quite few of our developers are
I have decided to use Netbeans and Mercurial for my latest project (after no

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.