Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8459793
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T13:25:36+00:00 2026-06-10T13:25:36+00:00

I have a method like this: public void MyMethod(int p1, int p2) { //some

  • 0

I have a method like this:

public void MyMethod(int p1, int p2) {
  //some logic here
  MyObject mo = new MyObject(var1,var2);
  int returnedId = mo.doOperation(something);
  //Do something with the returnedId;
}

I want to test this method but I can’t mock the constructor call, so a test around this would break modularity. I could do it with a factory method or something but since I only have one constructor there is no point.

How is this generally done using EasyMock?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T13:25:37+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 1:25 pm

    You can’t do that with EasyMock only. But there are workaround solutions, like using PowerMock as an extension to EasyMock, so that you can mock static methods, constructor calls, final methods etc.

    But before doing that, analyze your problem carefully. Do you really need to create MyObject inside MyMethod? In general, it is far better to design classes in a way that all its dependencies are passed in as constructor arguments or via setters. This is the pattern commonly called “dependency injection”. By doing dependency injection, you avoid testability problems like the one you mentioned.

    Also, MyMethod could take MyObject as a parameter or it could be obtained by a factory, as Duncan Jones points out. Both solutions are usually better than mixing object instantiation with the application logic.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

If I have a method like this: public void DoSomething(int Count, string[] Lines) {
i have a method like this: public JObject Get(int id) { return new JObject(new
I have a generic method defined like this: public void MyMethod<T>(T myArgument) The first
I have a method that contains an asynchronous call like this: public void MyMethod()
I have a method to insert data into server like this: public void doInsert(){
In my code I have often situations like this: public void MyMethod(string data) {
If I have a method such as: public void MyMethod(int arg1, string arg2) How
I have a method like this: public IOrganizationService GetConnection(bool multi) { if(!multi) { Parallel.For(0,
I have wriiten a method like this public ArrayList<T> GetDoctorDetail(String name) { if (name!=null
I have a method that looks like this: public static String escape(String text) {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.