Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 198029
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T16:54:12+00:00 2026-05-11T16:54:12+00:00

I have a method that looks similar to the following: public void myMethod(MyClass c)

  • 0

I have a method that looks similar to the following:

public void myMethod(MyClass c)
{
  if (c == null)
  {
    return;
  }
  try
  {
    c.someMethod();
  }
  catch (SomeException e)
  {
    // log the exception, possibly re-throw
  }
}

I am trying to find a way to set up a mock instance of the MyClass parameter c such that it returns a value of null for itself, and that c.someMethod() is never called. My unit test looks like this:

@Test
public void Test_myMethod_With_Null_MyClass_Does_Not_Call_someMethod()
{
    Mockery mockery = new Mockery()
    {{
            setImposteriser(ClassImposteriser.INSTANCE);
    }};

    final MyClass mockMyClass = mockery.mock(MyClass.class);

    try
    {
        mockery.checking(new Expectations()
        {{
            oneOf(mockMyClass).equals(null);
                will(returnValue(true));

            never(mockMyClass).someMethod();
        }});
    }
    catch (Exception e)
    {
        logger.fatal(e);
        fail("Exception thrown in test.");
    }
    Util.myMethod(mockMyClass);
}

Basically, i’m setting up a mock instance of MyClass, and setting the expectations on it that when its value is tested against the null value, it will return true, and that the method someMethod() is never called.

Right now, the test is failing, as jMock says that it’s not possible to override methods provided by the Object class (the equals(null) part).

Is there a way to do this with jMock? Does this pattern make sense? Is this a valid test? If not, does anyone have any suggestions on how to test this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T16:54:12+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 4:54 pm

    I do not think you can test this code using only JMock.

    I would test this by passing in null directly. If no exceptions are thrown or logged, you know that your code worked as expected.@Test

    public void Test_myMethod_With_Null_MyClass_Does_Not_Call_someMethod()
    {
        Util.myMethod(null);
        //no exception should be thrown.
    }
    

    If you wanted to make it more explicit, you could wrap the myMethod(null) call in a try/catch block, but that is not necessary except to clarify the failure reason when there is a failure.

    public void Test_myMethod_With_Null_MyClass_Does_Not_Call_someMethod()
    {
        try
        {
            Util.myMethod(null);
        }
        catch( ExpectedException e )
        {
            fail( "Should not have thrown exception: " + e.getMessage() ); 
        }
    }
    

    This is a sufficient test because you know that if c is null then c.something() of course cannot be called.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a method that looks like this: public static String escape(String text) {
I have a method that looks like: T[] field; public Method(IList<T> argument) { this.field
For example I have a method that looks like this [self performSelectorOnMainThread:@selector(someMethod) withObject:data waitUntilDone:YES];
I have a method in a url rewriting module that looks like this public
I have a method that looks for the word 'not' and then a word
Let's say that I have a method that looks like this: def raise_if_client_status_error(xml_resp) #
I have a method on an interface that looks like this and I want
I have a method in an assembly that looks like this: namespace MyNameSpace {
I have a simple method (running on Tomcat 6.0.35) that looks like so: @RequestMapping(value
I have a class similar to the following: class SomeClass { public: template<typename... Args>

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.