Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 139595
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:27:48+00:00 2026-05-11T07:27:48+00:00

I have a method that should only be called when a property of a

  • 0

I have a method that should only be called when a property of a specific object is set to false. This is its initial value. After the first call, the property is set to true, ensuring that the call is only ever made once.

However, when I mock the class that performs this change, the mock object does not change the property of the underlying object.

Is there a way to force a change of a property on an object is response to an Expectation being met?

Something along the lines of…

Expect.Call(mockedObject.TestMethod(underlyingObject)).NowDoThis(delegate() { underlyingObject.Processed = true; }); 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:27:48+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:27 am

    Yes,

    instead of your NowDoThis() call try Do()


    Finally home so I can try out some code.

    The trick is to cast the anonymous delegate to type Action that derrives from System.Delegate (type MethodInvoker should also work but that type is only available in System.Windows.Forms)

    Here’s the code. I’m more comfortable with the rhino mocks AAA syntax. Let me know if I have to convert it to Expect.Call syntax. I’m also using xunit.net, [Fact] just means [Test]

    public interface Thingie {     bool Flag { get; set; }     void DoSomething(); }  [Fact] public void Test() {     var thingie = MockRepository.GenerateStub<Thingie>();      thingie.Stub(x => x.DoSomething()).Do((Action) delegate { thingie.Flag = true; });      Assert.False(thingie.Flag);      thingie.DoSomething();      Assert.True(thingie.Flag); } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 78k
  • Answers 79k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • added an answer Try this. May 11, 2026 at 3:58 pm
  • added an answer You should use an inline tag like <span> May 11, 2026 at 3:58 pm
  • added an answer Does it have to be done within vim? Could you… May 11, 2026 at 3:58 pm

Related Questions

Ok, so I have a very simple form with next to no logic in
I have a little dilemma that maybe you can help me sort out. I've
What is the preferred/easiest way to find the control that is currently receiving user
I have a class with a static method that looks roughly like: class X

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.