Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6789301
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T17:35:15+00:00 2026-05-26T17:35:15+00:00

I have a method that takes 30 parameters. I took the parameters and put

  • 0

I have a method that takes 30 parameters. I took the parameters and put them into one class, so that I could just pass one parameter (the class) into the method. Is it perfectly fine in the case of refactoring to pass in an object that encapsulates all the parameters even if that is all it contains.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T17:35:16+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 5:35 pm

    That is a great idea. It is typically how data contracts are done in WCF for example.

    One advantage of this model is that if you add a new parameter, the consumer of the class doesn’t need to change just to add the parameter.

    As David Heffernan mentions, it can help self document the code:

    FrobRequest frobRequest = new FrobRequest
    {
        FrobTarget = "Joe",
        Url = new Uri("http://example.com"),
        Count = 42,
    };
    FrobResult frobResult = Frob(frobRequest);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a static method that takes a parameter and returns a class. the
I have a method that takes a std::vector as one of its parameters. Is
I have a Java method that takes 3 parameters, and I'd like it to
I have a method that takes a list of entities ( Class es) and
I have a problem with my database class. I have a method that takes
iOS 5.0 SDK I have a method that took a parameter as a 'type'
Suppose I have a function/method F() that takes 3 parameters $A, $B and $C
I have an action method that takes in a string as its only parameter.
I have a junit test method that takes a CommonsMultipartFile object as a parameter.
i have a method that takes as a parameter an expression because I need

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.