Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 967225
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T02:16:54+00:00 2026-05-16T02:16:54+00:00

I have a model, Foo, that has_many Bars. It has a virtual attribute, current_baz,

  • 0

I have a model, Foo, that has_many Bars. It has a virtual attribute, current_baz, that returns the baz attribute of the latest Bar from the association (if one exists). I’d like to define Foo.current_baz= so that one can say my_foo.update_attributes(:current_baz => 7), and in particular, I’d like it to work when a new Foo is created. That way I can say

Foo.new(:current_baz => 7, ...)

and it should do

self.bars.build(:baz => 7)

Of course, it doesn’t work, because the new Foo doesn’t have an id yet and thus the new Bar isn’t valid. I know how to work around this in a controller, creating first the Foo and then the Bar and wrapping both in a transaction. But I’d really like to keep this logic in the model if possible. It seems almost possible. Does anyone have any suggestions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T02:16:54+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:16 am

    There are a few ways to do this, but one way that I’ve done in the past (particularly if you can rely on there being only one new bar object at a time is to make an instance variable for the unsaved bar, inside foo. So then, to sketch that out, you’d say:

    if self.new?
      @new_bar = bar.new
      @new_bar.baz = new_current_baz_value
    else
      self.bars.build(:baz => 7)
    end
    

    Then, you add an after_save handler that says

    if @new_bar
      @new_bar.foo = self
      @new_bar.save
      @new_bar = nil
    end
    

    Then, finally, when you call current_baz, you need to test for the existenceof a new_bar, like so:

    if @new_bar
      return @new_bar.baz
    else
      return self.bars.last.baz
    end
    

    Does that make sense?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a model, Thing, that has a has_many with ThingPhoto, using Paperclip to
Let's say I have a model like this class Foo(db.Model): id = db.StringProperty() bar
I have this: SolutionName: Foo.sln Assembly: Foo.Bar Namespaces are: Foo.Bar.Views Foo.Bar.Model Foo.Bar.BusinessObjects Foo.Bar.Services Should
I have an ActiveRecord model, Foo , which has a name field. I'd like
I have a model Foo which have a ForeignKey to the User model. Later,
In my Core Data managed object model, I have an entity Foo with a
I have a model being populated by my data layer and then I have
I have some model objects I'm using in my Java client application. Later these
I have a model Question with a field called userid , before one ask
Let's say I have this model named Product with a field named brand .

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.