Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 882621
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T12:27:21+00:00 2026-05-15T12:27:21+00:00

I have a mutable array that has been retained. This array contain dictionaries with

  • 0

I have a mutable array that has been retained.

This array contain dictionaries with lots of keys. Each dictionary contains objects.

Do I have to retain the dictionaries before adding them to the mutable array or will the array itself retain everything that is added to it (because it is already retained), including the sub objects of its objects in the hierarchy?

thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T12:27:22+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 12:27 pm

    A Foundation container, like NSArray or NSDictionary, retains the objects it directly owns, but not subobjects owned by the objects.

    For example, if NSArray*a contains NSArray*b and it in turn contains NSArray*c, a retains b and b retains c but a doesn’t retain c.

    That said, your are thinking from a wrong perspective. It’s not correct for you to wonder such as “do I have to retain this object (say x) before passing x to another object y, because y might not retain it appropriately?” The point of retain/release is that to make sure an object retains and releases objects it owns. You trust other objects to do the same.

    Then, all you have to make sure if you put an object x to an array y, is for you not to release x (if it’s not autoreleased) once it becomes unnecessary to you. If y needs it, y retains it, so you don’t have to care about it.

    Say you have a pre-existing NSMutableArray*array. Then you would do in a method something like this:

     NSMutableDictionary* dictionary=[[NSMutableDictionary alloc] init];
     ... do something with dictionary ... 
     [array addObject:dictionary];
     [dictionary release];
    

    You see, it’s the array’s responsibility to retain the dictionary, if that array needs it. It needs it, and so it retains it. You don’t have to care about that.

    The method’s responsibility is to retain the dictionary if the method needs it, to release it if the method no longer needs it. So, as shown above, the method releases it once it’s done with it by adding it to the array.

    Again: the whole point of retain/release is to allow you to consider the life cycle of an object very locally in the code.

    Whenever you call a method method:of another object a by passing an object b, you don’t have to worry as you do now whether method: retains b or not, and you don’t have to worry if you need to retain b before passing b to method:.

    It is because every method in the Cocoa framework, and every method you write, retain the object b passed to it if the method needs it later, and don’t retain b if it doesn’t need it later.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 441k
  • Answers 441k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer yes, what you have mentioned about async:true is correct. So… May 15, 2026 at 5:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I found a solution. And because it took me a… May 15, 2026 at 5:37 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Class-like function orgranisation of code in C is used often.… May 15, 2026 at 5:37 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.