Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 879235
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T11:53:58+00:00 2026-05-15T11:53:58+00:00

I have a need to archive an array of objects of several different types.

  • 0

I have a need to archive an array of objects of several different types. Each object has its own instance vars.

Is it better to create singleton object with an array that holds ~20 archived objects, or have a single archived object that has an array of all the other objects? Sorry if that’s confusing, but I’m a bit confused myself.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T11:53:59+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:53 am

    Is the array something that already exists? If so, the owner of the array of objects should archive the array.

    If you just have disparate objects that need archiving you probably need to describe your architecture a bit further.

    In general, the owning object would archive the instance being archived.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to have a routine/function/stored proc/whatever to archive particular accounts from our 'active'
I need to have an entity that has two separate candidate keys where one
We have need for a rating system in a project we are working on,
I have need to select a number of 'master' rows from a table, also
I have the need to read the Thunderbird address book on the fly. It
I have a need to display a UITableView containing a user's account credentials. For
I have a need to create a transactional process using an external API that
I have a need to close a parent form from within child form from
I have a need to do auditing all database activity regardless of whether it
I have the need to copy the entire contents of a directory on a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.