Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 553209
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T11:34:52+00:00 2026-05-13T11:34:52+00:00

I have a .NET queue object. The producer thread do the Enqueue operation, the

  • 0

I have a .NET queue object. The producer thread do the Enqueue operation, the data enqueued in the queue is a byte[] array, while the other consumer thread do the Dequeue operation on the same queue object.

I use locks to handle concurrency. My code seems to work fine all the time, but yesterday, weird things happened. The data I got from a consumer thread was different from the data I produced: the array length wrong、repeated array… Is this caused by the failed thread-safe protection?

In my opinion, concurrency would only cause data loss.

My first post here, bear with me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T11:34:52+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:34 am

    It is far worse than simple data loss. The Queue class can re-allocate its internal buffer when needed to accommodate a growing number of elements. Improper locking can access the new buffer with old values of the head and tail indices. You’ll only get an exception when you’re lucky, more likely is that you simply get the wrong element.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 499k
  • Answers 499k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could require a cookie be present, redirect if it… May 16, 2026 at 12:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You don't get to return the result because it's not… May 16, 2026 at 12:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer C# and VB have runtimes, too. They are just DLLs… May 16, 2026 at 12:29 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

We have a .Net object that has a static delegate (a data access strategy)
I'm toying with the idea of implementing a generic Producer/Consumer pair + processing queue
I am writing a ASP.NET queue processor. Users will login and upload data files
I have a .net windows service that works it's way through a queue of
I have an ASP.NET app, very basic, but right now too much code to
We have taken over some .NET 1.1 Windows Service code that spawns threads to
I have developed an object pool and cannot seem to do it without using
In my ASP.NET MVC application I have a number of threads that wait for
I have an application built in C# with the .Net Framework 3.5 SP1 (also
I have an .NET app and it runs fast through about 2000 records that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.