Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3331364
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T23:34:37+00:00 2026-05-17T23:34:37+00:00

I have a number of packages in my Java web application. In some of

  • 0

I have a number of packages in my Java web application. In some of them I use this construct:

public class Foo {
  private static Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger("com.XXX");
  public void bar() {
    Foo.logger.debug("Method bar() was just called");
  }
}

Of course, it’s just an example. Everything works fine, but I don’t like the idea of logger initialization in many classes. It’s an obvious code duplication. I would like to move it to some helper class and let all other classes access it. Is it a correct idea? Or maybe there is some other “best practice” or a pattern?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T23:34:38+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 11:34 pm

    You could write your own utility class which wraps the global logger and implements static delegates to the logger methods. Then just do a static import of this class:

    public class MyLogger {
      private static Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger("application");
    
      public static void debug(String s) {logger.debug(s));}
    
      public static void debug(Class<?> caller, String s) {
         LoggerFactory.getLogger(caller.getName()).debug(s);
      }
    
      // ...
    }
    

    Usage:

    import static MyLogger.*;
    
    public class Foo {
      public void bar() {
        // makes use of static import!
        debug("Method bar() was just called"); 
        debug(this.getClass(), "Method bar() was just called"); 
      }
    }
    

    Added an overloaded version of the example debug delegate which takes a class object and uses the appropriate Logger.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a class like this: public class MyClass { private Queue<MyOtherClass> myQueue; }
I have developed a Java Swing application, which uses the SwingWorker class to perform
Below is a class I have written in a web application I am building
I have an ASP.Net web application that is deployed to a number of different
I have a simple program written in Java: package edu.oakland.lecture; public class Alfa {
I have written a bash script which installs a number of packages, however for
I have a deployed version 0.6 of Node.js with a considerable number of packages
I'm working on an application in Java, that needs to do some complex logic
I have an Ant script which turns my Java application into a nice Mac
I have a series of dependent Java projects. I'd like to package them together

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.