Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 820993
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T02:34:07+00:00 2026-05-15T02:34:07+00:00

I have a one-many relationship in my local Sqlite db. Pretty basic stuff. When

  • 0

I have a one-many relationship in my local Sqlite db. Pretty basic stuff. When I do my left outer join I get back results that look like this:

the resulting cursor has multiple rows that look like this:

A1.id | A1.column1 | A1.column2 | B1.a_id_fk | B1.column1 | B1.column2 

A1.id | A1.column1 | A1.column2 | B2.a_id_fk | B2.column1 | B2.column2 

and so on…

Is there a standard practice or method of dealing with results like this ? Clearly there is only A1, but it has many B-n relationships. I am coming close to using multiple queries instead of the “relational db way”. Hopefully I am just not aware of the better way to do things.

I intend to expose this query via a content provider and I would hate for all of the consumers to have to write the same aggregation logic.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T02:34:08+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 2:34 am

    Joins have worked this way in every SQL database I’ve ever used — it’s kinda the definition of the concept.

    Bear in mind that content providers involve remote procedure calls, which are expensive. That’s one of the reason why Android denormalizes results along the same lines as your join for things like contacts, to minimize the round-trips between processes.

    You could consider using a remote service instead of a content provider, and exposing a custom API. You could return the B’s for a given A by a simple List<>. Or, you could serialize the whole thing in JSON format. Or any number of other possibilities, if the data duplication disturbs you.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 505k
  • Answers 505k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to offset the bits, otherwise there's no way… May 16, 2026 at 3:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Simply break out of the PHP block to output regular… May 16, 2026 at 3:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There is a whole chapter on that in the PHPUnit… May 16, 2026 at 3:27 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I've got a one-to-many relationship set up. (Ex. A Person with many Phone Numbers).
I have a Java object that I want to store in a local in-memory
I'm new to rails and have volunteered to help out the local High School
When I have a parent Entity hold a list of other entity (one to
I have small problem when trying to create many-to-many link in doctrine. I have
I'm having some trouble using constraints correctly. I have three tables, 'item', 'store' and
I am using Linq and the Entity Framework. I have a Page Entity, that
I have a product object that contains 2 collections, accessories and consumers. Consumers relates
This is for Entity Framework for .NET 3.5: I have the need to query
I have two entities: Project, Employee Employee has primary key {employeeId} + some other

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.