Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8737273
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T10:29:02+00:00 2026-06-13T10:29:02+00:00

I have a one-to-many relationship and cannot get cascade to work, once I set

  • 0

I have a one-to-many relationship and cannot get cascade to work, once I set cascade I just get “object references an unsaved transient instance …”.

My mapping looks like this

public class SharedDetailsMapping : ClassMap<SharedDetails>
{
    public SharedDetailsMapping()
    {
        Id(x => x.Id).GeneratedBy.Identity();
        HasMany(x => x.Foos);
    }
}

public class FooMapping : ClassMap<Foo>
{
    public FooMapping()
    {
        Id(x => x.Id).GeneratedBy.Identity();
        References(x => x.SharedDetails).Cascade.SaveUpdate();
    }
}

The classes like this

public class Foo
{
    public Foo()
    {
        SharedDetails = new SharedDetails();
        SharedDetails.Foos.Add(this);
    }

    public Foo(SharedDetails sharedDetails)
    {
        SharedDetails = sharedDetails;
        SharedDetails.Foos.Add(this);
    }

    public virtual Guid Id { get; set; }
    public virtual SharedDetails SharedDetails { get; set; }
}

public class SharedDetails
{
    public SharedDetails()
    {
        Foos = new List<Foo>();
    }

    public virtual Guid Id { get; set; }
    public virtual IList<Foo> Foos { get; set; }
}

I then want to create Foos without having to save the SharedDetails first if its a new Foo, like so:

using (var transaction = _session.BeginTransaction())
{
    var shared = new SharedDetails();

    var fooOne = new Foo(shared);
    _session.SaveOrUpdate(fooOne);

    var fooTwo = new Foo(shared);
    _session.SaveOrUpdate(fooTwo);

    transaction.Commit();
}

Cannot figure out what I have done wrong, it works ofcurse if I save the SharedDetails first but that is why I have Cascade setup.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T10:29:04+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 10:29 am

    In your SharedDetailsMapping, modify your HasMany to add .Inverse():

    public class SharedDetailsMapping : ClassMap<SharedDetails>
    {
        public SharedDetailsMapping()
        {
            Id(x => x.Id).GeneratedBy.Identity();
            HasMany(x => x.Foos)
               .Inverse();
        }
    }
    

    This instructs NHibernate that Foo owns the relationship, which will help it save objects in the relationship in the right order (in this case, the SharedDetails has to get saved first so we have its ID when Foo is saved).

    Further info on the purpose/when to use Inverse: NHibernate’s inverse – what does it really mean?

    The TL;DNR version:

    If you have a bidirectional relationship in your classes (HasMany on one side, References on the other), the HasMany should have .Inverse().

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a one-to-many relationship between Foo and Bar and I cannot perform an
I have a Vessel object that has a one-to-many relationship with a VesselDetail object.
I seem to have major problems getting a one to many relationship to work
I have a parent object which has a one to many relationship with an
I have a one-to-many relationship between two classes for this situation. I have a
In this test Core Data project, I have a one to many relationship from
Here, the Sencha team explains how to have a one to many relationship: http://docs.sencha.com/ext-js/4-0/#!/api/Ext.data.Store
I have a simple one-to-many relationship. I would like to select rows from the
I have two tables connected with one to many relationship. Parent Table is a
I have an NSManagedObject who has a one to many relationship with the parent

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.