Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8749977
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T12:47:02+00:00 2026-06-13T12:47:02+00:00

I have a package P with public interface I public class S1 extends Foo

  • 0

I have a package P with

  • public interface I
  • public class S1 extends Foo implements I
  • public class S2 extends Bar implements I.

Now I want to forbid implementations of I outside of P, but I should be public, since I use it for a public method(I parameter).

How can this be done?

Is there some “package-final pattern” for this?

Did you ever have such a situation?


Details:

I’m aware of the possibility of using an abstract class with only package private constructors instead of interface I, but S1 and S2 extend different classes, so I would need multiple inheritance (since simulated multiple inheritance (see e.g. Effective Java item 18) does not work here).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T12:47:03+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 12:47 pm

    You could also try the following attempt:

    Use a dummy package private interface and create a method in your public interface which returns it. Like this:

    public interface I {
      Dummy getDummy(); // this can only be used and implemented inside of the 
                        // current package, because Dummy is package private
      String methodToUseOutsideOfPackage();
    }
    
    interface Dummy {}
    

    Thanks to this, only classes from the current package will be able to implement interface I. All classes from outside will never be able to implement the method Dummy getDummy(). At the same time the classes from outside of the package will be able to use all other methods of the interface I which do not have the Dummy interface in their signature.

    This solution isn’t beautiful, because you have one useless method in your interface I, but you should be able to achieve what you want.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Suppose I have following code package memoryleak; public class MemoryLeak { public static int
I have a very simple code: package mygame; public class RunGame { public static
I have a config file like package com.mypackage.referencedata.config; @Configuration @ComponentScan (com.mypackage.referencedata.*) public class ReferenceDataConfig
If I have a java class which is package-private (declared with class, not public
I have the following simple Java code: package testj; import java.util.*; public class Query<T>
I have two classes. package utilities; public class PostCaller { public String getUrl() {
I have an interface like the following: package example; import java.awt.Point; public interface Thing
I have some classes that implement an interface, but also extend the Sprite class:
So I have made this simple interface: package{ public interface GraphADT{ function addNode(newNode:Node):Boolean; }
I have made a class Location which looks like this: package TruckingCompany; public class

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.