Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 171057
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T12:55:11+00:00 2026-05-11T12:55:11+00:00

I have a package with a public abstract class Player { /*…*/ } and

  • 0

I have a package with a

public abstract class Player { /*...*/ } 

and these

public abstract class GamePlayer extends Player { /*...*/ } public abstract class TournamentPlayer extends Player { /*...*/ } public abstract class StatelessPlayer extends Player { /*...*/ } 

Users of the package need Players but in order to use the package without breaking it I require that they never directly extend Player. Instead they should extend one of the subclasses provided.

Question: How should I prevent users from extending Player directly?

I’m looking for a way that makes it obvious that this prohibition is intended.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T12:55:12+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 12:55 pm

    Make the constructors in Player have package access only. Then they won’t be able to call the constructor or extend it themselves. If you don’t already have an explicit constructor in Player, create one (as otherwise the compiler will create a default public parameterless constructor).

    (Note that I’ve only suggested doing this to the constructor. The class itself can be public so that clients can still use it.)

    This works because any constructor (other than in java.lang.Object) has to call a superclass constructor (either explicitly or implicitly). If there are no accessible constructors, you can’t create the subclass.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 95k
  • Answers 96k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer To protect from "Cross-site request forgery" from server side, it… May 11, 2026 at 7:06 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I don't particularly like the answer I've typed up below,… May 11, 2026 at 7:06 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes. I can think of some reasons: Ease of mocking… May 11, 2026 at 7:06 pm

Related Questions

I have a package with a public abstract class Player { /*...*/ } and
I have a Java Maven project with about 800 source files (some generated by
I am building a system for distributing packages (.zip archives) created by different organizations.
I have two classes, and want to include a static instance of one class
I've created a package that contains a stored procedure that I plan to invoke

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.