Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 302933
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T07:08:33+00:00 2026-05-12T07:08:33+00:00

I have a Perl routine that manages error checking. There are about 10 different

  • 0

I have a Perl routine that manages error checking. There are about 10 different checks and some are nested, based on prior success. These are typically not exceptional cases where I would need to croak/die. Also, once an error occurs, there’s no point in running through the rest of the checks.

However, I can’t seem to think of a neat way to solve this issue except by using something analogous to the following horrid hack:

sub lots_of_checks
{

 if(failcond)
 {
  goto failstate:
 }
 elsif(failcond2)
 {
  goto failstate;
 }

 #This continues on and on until...

 return 1; #O happy day!

 failstate:

 return 0; #Dead...
}

What I would prefer to be able to do would be something like so:

do
{
 if(failcond)
 {
  last;
 }
 #...
};
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T07:08:33+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 7:08 am

    An empty return statement is a better way of returning false from a Perl sub than returning 0. The latter value will actually be true in list context:

    sub lots_of_checks {
        return if fail_condition_1;
        return if fail_condition_2;
        # ...
        return 1;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 195k
  • Answers 195k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You didn't specify your Delphi version, but this is a… May 12, 2026 at 7:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Check AddThis.com. It supports many services. I looks like this… May 12, 2026 at 7:01 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you're a bit more careful in your solution to… May 12, 2026 at 7:01 pm

Related Questions

This is a followup to How can I get around a ‘die’ call in
Yes, the problem is with a library I'm using, and no, I cannot modify
So I am following this guide: http://technotes.1000lines.net/?p=23 and I am going through the steps.
I'd like to create a routine that does some logging, takes some other actions,

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.