Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7186939
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T18:44:16+00:00 2026-05-28T18:44:16+00:00

I have a piece of code that needs to do many computations based on

  • 0

I have a piece of code that needs to do many computations based on double values, which takes too much time. Can I speed this up by dropping some decimals? if I use a formatter to parse the double, won’t that do the calculus first and then shed the extra decimals, so nothing would be gained? what’s the best way of doing this?

Just something to get an idea:

double avgRatingForPreferredItem = (double) tempAverageRating.get(matrix.get(0).getItemID1())/matrix.size(); 
   double avgRatingForRandomItem = (double) tempAverageRating.get(matrix.get(0).getItemID2())/matrix.size();

double numarator = 0;
   for (MatrixColumn matrixCol : matrix) {
     numarator += ( matrixCol.getRatingForItemID1() - avgRatingForPreferredItem ) * (matrixCol.getRatingForItemID2() - avgRatingForRandomItem);
   }

   double numitor = 0;
   double numitorStanga = 0;
   double numitorDreapta = 0;
   for (MatrixColumn matrixCol : matrix) {
     numitorStanga += (matrixCol.getRatingForItemID1() - avgRatingForPreferredItem) * (matrixCol.getRatingForItemID1() - avgRatingForPreferredItem);
     numitorDreapta += (matrixCol.getRatingForItemID2() - avgRatingForRandomItem) * (matrixCol.getRatingForItemID2() - avgRatingForRandomItem);
   }

   numitor = Math.sqrt( numitorStanga * numitorDreapta );

   double corelare = numarator/numitor;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T18:44:17+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 6:44 pm

    I don’t believe the actual values involved can make any difference.

    It’s worth at least trying to reduce the computations here:

    for (MatrixColumn matrixCol : matrix) {
     numitorStanga  += (matrixCol.getRatingForItemID1() - avgRatingForPreferredItem)
                     * (matrixCol.getRatingForItemID1() - avgRatingForPreferredItem);
     numitorDreapta += (matrixCol.getRatingForItemID2() - avgRatingForRandomItem) 
                     * (matrixCol.getRatingForItemID2() - avgRatingForRandomItem);
    }
    

    It depends on how smart the JIT compiler is – and I’m assuming getRatingforItemID1 and getRatingforItemID2 are just pass-through properties – but your code at least looks like it’s doing redundant subtractions. So:

    for (MatrixColumn matrixCol : matrix) {
      double diff1 = matrixCol.getRatingForItemID1() - avgRatingForPreferredItem;
      double diff2 = matrixCol.getRatingForItemID2() - avgRatingForPreferredItem;
      numitorStanga += diff1 * diff1;
      numitorDreapta += diff2 * diff2;
    }
    

    You could try changing everything to float instead of double – on some architectures that may make things faster; on others it may well not.

    Are you absolutely sure that it’s the code you’ve shown which has the problem, though? It’s only an O(N) algorithm – how long is it taking, and how large is the matrix?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a piece of C# code that needs to convert a string array
I have a piece of code that takes several rows from a database and
I have a big piece of code that needs to be inserted into DOM
I have this piece of code that does not work: public CartaoCidadao() { InitializeComponent();
I have this piece of code that works fine in subsonic 2.2, I migrated
I have a piece of code that load a very big image in memory.
I have a piece of code that look similar to this: <xsl:choose> <xsl:when test=some_test>
I have a piece of code that calls a WCF service that is hosted
If have a piece of code that gets some data from a sql database
I have a piece of code that converts an infix expression to an expression

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.