Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1029119
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T12:29:42+00:00 2026-05-16T12:29:42+00:00

I have a pointer which keeps incrementing and I need to return the head

  • 0

I have a “pointer” which keeps incrementing and I need to return the “head” of the pointer finally. I am in a dilemma to use either “pointer[0]” or have another variable called “head” and initialize it and return at the end. The former I feel makes the code looks soiled and later costs little memory. Any clean suggestion?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T12:29:43+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 12:29 pm

    You will always need two variables:

    Foo *head = getSomeList();
    Foo *tail = head;
    while (tail->isValid())
      ++tail;
    // You have head and tail here
    

    You cannot really implement it much differently because tail[0] != head (unless the list is empty).

    Showing the code and telling us what exactly you try to achieve might lead to better answers.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a pointer which points to a function. I would like to: if
I have a char pointer which would be used to store a string. It
If you have a C pointer which was defined in a method and are
Suppose I have some pointer, which I want to reinterpret as static dimension array
I have Java application which sends pointer to function (callback) to some native dll
I have a std::atomic which contains a pointer to a member function. Everything compiles
I have a class with a static factory constructor which returns a pointer to
I have a Snake class, which has a pointer to a Controller class object.
I have got a problem with calling a global function, which takes a pointer
I have this situation: I have a class which keeps track of an array

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.