Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 761469
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T15:50:29+00:00 2026-05-14T15:50:29+00:00

I have a problem about malloc(). It is weird. My code is in the

  • 0

I have a problem about malloc(). It is weird.
My code is in the following.
I use random generator to generate elements for an array.
The array is opened by malloc().
If the array size is smaller than 8192, it is OK. If the size is larger than 8192, it shows segment fault.

void random_generator(int num, int * array) {

  srand((unsigned)time(0)); 
  int random_integer; 
  for(int index=0; index< num; index++){ 
    random_integer = (rand()%10000)+1; 
    *(array+index) = random_integer; 
    cout << index << endl;
  } 
}

int main() {
  int array_size = 10000;
  int *input_array;
  input_array = (int*) malloc((array_size));
  random_generator(8192, input_array);    // if the number is larger than 8192, segment fault
  free(input_array);
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T15:50:29+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:50 pm

    malloc() takes the size in bytes, not the number of elements. The size of an int is typcially 4 bytes, so you are actually allocating only enough memory for 2500 integers. You are allocating array_size bytes, while you should be allocating array_size * sizeof(int) bytes.

    So, the error will be fixed by

    input_array = (int*) malloc(array_size * sizeof(int));

    P.S. Never assume that you know the size of an int or any other data type, as it is platform dependent. Always use sizeof().

    P.P.S. This is really a C question, rather than a C++ question. If you are actually using C++, you should consider using new and delete [] instead of malloc() and free(), or better yet use std::vector instead of an array, as Neil pointed out.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 400k
  • Answers 400k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Solved it: Since the SSRS was inside an Iframe of… May 15, 2026 at 4:11 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It looks like the Script() function of a table can… May 15, 2026 at 4:11 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You should be able to get TinyXML set up and… May 15, 2026 at 4:11 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.