I have a problem I want to know your opinion.
I am trying to use Repository Pattern. I have a repository object which load data to a POCO. I have also created a Business logic layer which adds a little bit of functionality but basically wraps the POCO. So in the end I have a BLL which loads DAO with usage of repository.
I am not very happy with this solution. I have a three layers but I feel that BLL is not providing enought functionality to keep it there. On the other hand I do not want to put my logic in the repository layer nor data access layer?
So my question is where should I put logic for application? Which solution do you use(DAO + repo or DAO + BLL + rep or any other)?
There are two basic ways to think about business rules when designing your domain.
1.) The domain entities are basic POCO/DTOs. And you hand them off to domain services. These services could be as simple as another class, or they really could be actual services sitting on another server.
2.) The domain entities contain their own operation logic. This is closer to what many MVC patterns will follow. And since you asked, this is the model that I prefer.
Both are completely valid patterns. #1 has a discrete business operation tier, but suffers from an Anemic Domain Model. #2 can lead to big domain entities if you domain starts to become complicated, or if a model can do a lot of things.
EDIT #1: Response to John Kraft
I mostly agree. Do you have a single Oven service, or do you have dozens of available ovens stored in an oven repository where oven is just another domain entity? In #2, the oven is part of the domain. The way I tend to do domain modeling, most nouns are domain entities, unless you are 100% sure that there is exactly one of the thing.
But something does happen to pizza when it is baked.