Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 996199
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T06:50:25+00:00 2026-05-16T06:50:25+00:00

I have a problem that can be simplified as follows: I have a particular

  • 0

I have a problem that can be simplified as follows: I have a particular set of objects that I want to modify in a particular way. So, it’s possible for me to write a function that modifies a single object and then create a decorator that applies that function to all of the objects in the set.

So, let’s suppose I have something like this:

def modify_all(f):
    def fun(objs):
        for o in objs:
            f(o)

@modify_all
def modify(obj):
    # Modify obj in some way.

modify(all_my_objs)

However, there may also be times when I just want to operate on one object by itself.

Is there a way to “undecorate” the modify function programmatically to get the original (single object) function back again? (Without just removing the decorator, I mean.) Or is there another approach that would be better to use in such a case?

Just for clarity and completeness, there’s quite a bit more going on in the actual modify_all decorator than is illustrated here. Both modify and modify_all have a certain amount of work to carry out, which is why I thought the decorator might be nice. Additionally, I have other variants of modify that can directly benefit from modify_all, which makes it even more useful. But I do sometimes need to do things using the original modify function. I know that I can always pass in a one-element set to “trick” it into working as-is, but I’m wondering if there’s a better way or a better design for the situation.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T06:50:26+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 6:50 am

    Alex had already posted something similar but it was my first thought too so I’ll go ahead and post it because it does sidestep Mike Grahams objection to it. (even if I don’t really agree with his objection: the fact that people don’t know about something is not a reason to not use it. This is how people continue to not know about it)

    def modify_all(f):
        def fun(objs):
            for o in objs:
                f(o)
        fun.unmodified = f
        return fun
    
    def undecorate(f):
        return f.unmodified
    
    @modify_all
    def modify(obj):
        # Modify obj in some way.
    
    modify(all_my_objs)
    undecorate(modify)(one_obj)
    

    You could just call undecorate to access the decorated function.

    another alternative would be to handle it like this:

    def modify_one(modify, one):
        return modify.unmodified(one)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the problem that an specific step in Ant can only be executed
I have a script that constantly segfaults - the problem that I can't solve
I have a weird date rounding problem that hopefully someone can solve. My client
I have simplified an issue that I've been having trying to isolate the problem,
I have a problem that confuses my users, being that although an item is
I have a problem that I would like have solved via a SQL query.
I have a problem that I feel is best implimented in a stand alone
I have a problem that seems like its a result of a deadlock-situation. Whe
I have the odd problem that I am not able to open the properties
I have encountered a problem that I have not come accross yet when setting

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.