Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6006607
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T01:33:51+00:00 2026-05-23T01:33:51+00:00

I have a procedure ( procedureA ) that loops through a table and calls

  • 0

I have a procedure (procedureA) that loops through a table and calls another procedure (procedureB) with variables derived from that table.

Each call to procedureB is independent of the last call.

When I run procedureA my system resources show a maximum CPU use of 50% (I assume that is 1 out of my 2 CPU cores).

However, if I open two instances of the mysql terminal and execute a query in both terminals, both CPU cores are used (CPU usage can reach close to 100%).

How can I achieve the same effect inside a stored procedure?

I want to do something like this:

BEGIN
    CALL procedureB(var1); -> CPU CORE #1
    SET var1 = var1+1;
    CALL procedureB(var1); -> CPU CORE #2
END

I know its not going to be that easy…
Any tips?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T01:33:51+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 1:33 am

    Within MySQL, to get something done asynchronously you’d have to use an CREATE EVENT, but I’m not sure whether creating one is allowed within a stored procedure. (On a side note: async. inserts can of course be done with INSERT DELAYED, but that’s 1 thread, period).

    Normally, you are much better of having a couple of processes/workers/deamons which can be accessed asynchronously by you program and have their own database connection, but that of course won’t be in the same procedure.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a stored procedure that returns values from a temp table. In my
I have a stored procedure that looks like: CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.usp_TestFilter @AdditionalFilter BIT =
I've seen a number of examples that have a thread procedure that looks like
Let's say I have a simple stored procedure that looks like this (note: this
I have a strange, sporadic issue. I have stored procedure that returns back 5
I have a stored procedure that consists of a single select query used to
I have a stored procedure that returns multiple tables. How can I execute and
I have a Stored Procedure that rolls-back a series of operations. I want to
I have a stored procedure that needs to convert hexadecimal numbers to their decimal
I have a stored procedure that returns two int Values. The first can not

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.