Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4118184
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T22:55:40+00:00 2026-05-20T22:55:40+00:00

I have a process I’d like to be able to run in the background

  • 0

I have a process I’d like to be able to run in the background by starting up a Gearman Client any time.

I’ve found success by opening up two SSH connections to my server, and in one starting the worker and in the other then running the client. This produces the desired output.

The problem is that, I’d like to have a worker constantly running in the background so I can just call up a client whenever I need to have the process done. But as soon as I close the terminal which has the worker PHP file running, a call to the client does not work – the worker seems to die.

Is there a way to have the worker run constantly in the background, so calling a new client will work without having to start up a new worker?

Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T22:55:41+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 10:55 pm

    If you want a program to keep running even after its parent is dead (i.e. you’ve closed your terminal), you must invoke it with nohup :

    nohup your-command &
    

    Quoting the relevant Wikipedia page I linked to :

    nohup is a POSIX command to ignore
    the HUP (hangup) signal, enabling
    the command to keep running after the
    user who issues the command has logged
    out
    .
    The HUP (hangup) signal is
    by convention the way a terminal warns
    depending processes of logout.

    For another (possibly more) interesting solution, see the following article : Dæmonize Your PHP.

    It points to Supervisord, which makes sures a process is still running, relaunching it if necessary.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have a process that needs to run every two hours. It's a process
I have two process and a shared memory zone, my workflow is like this.
I have a process that changes its current directory, and I would like to
I have a process that I need to run almost permanently. I've being using
I have a process where I want the main thread to run through a
I have 1 process that receives incoming connection from port 1000 in 1 linux
I have a process in erlang that is supposed to do something immediately after
I have a process in Linux that's getting a segmentation fault. How can I
I have a process in a website (Asp.net 3.5 using Linq-to-Sql for data access)
I have a process x that I want to check for leaks with valgrind

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.