Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8134211
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T09:55:58+00:00 2026-06-06T09:55:58+00:00

I have a program that holds many threads, lets put as an example six

  • 0

I have a program that holds many threads, lets put as an example six threads. Five of them should be able to use concurrently a given resource but the last thread shouldn’t if a given condition occurs and should wait until that condition is over.

In my understanding a ReentrantLock can’t be used because it can only be held by one thread at a time. In the other hand a Semaphore can be held by many threads at a time but I can’t find a way to attach the condition to aquire method.

Can This high level objects do the trick or I will have to implement this functionality using notify and wait directly?

Eg.

class A{
   getResource{ ... }
}

//This Runable could be spawn many times at the same time
class B implements Runnable{
   run {
      setConditionToTrue
      getResource
      ...
      getResource
      ...
      getResource
      setConditionToFalse
   }
}

//This will be working forever but only one Thread
class C implements Runnable{
   run{
      loop{
         if(Condition == true) wait
         getResource
      }
   }
}

Thanks in advance pals

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T09:56:00+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 9:56 am

    I am restating your problem here: You want your B threads to access the shared resource concurrently, but your C thread should wait for some condition to occur before using the resource.

    If I understand your question correctly, You can use ReentrantLock to solve your problem.

    Introduce a new function called getAccess() and make the C thread call this function to get the shared resource. Introduce two more functions to allow and stop the access to shared resource.

    class A {
    
      private final ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();
      private Condition someCondition = lock.newCondition();
      private boolean bCondition = false;
    
      getResource{ ... } // Your existing method used by B threads
    
      getAccess() { // Protected access to some resource, called by C thread
        lock.acquire();
    
        try {
          if (!bCondition)
            someCondition.await(); // B thread will wait here but releases the lock
        } finally {
          lock.release();
        }
      }
    
      allowAccess() { // B thread can call this func to notify C and allow access
        lock.acquire();
        try {
          bCondition = true;
          someCondition.signal(); // Decided to release the resource
        } finally {
          lock.release();
        }
      }
    
      stopAccess() { // B thread can stop the access
        lock.acquire();
        try {
          bCondition = false;
        } finally {
          lock.release();
        }
      }
    
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have program that has a variable that should never change. However, somehow, it
I'm working on a Java/Groovy program. I have a double variable that holds a
I have program that requires Python 3, but I develop Django and it uses
I have program that runs fast enough. I want to see the number of
I have a program that gets a JSON from the server using getJSON and
I have a program that saves an image in a local directory and then
I have a program that reads from a file that grabs 4 bytes from
I have a program that encrypts files, but adds the extension .safe to the
I have a program that I want to distribute, without giving the source code
I have a program that is used to create other program and compile it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.