Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8711429
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T04:52:30+00:00 2026-06-13T04:52:30+00:00

I have a program where a bunch of threads carry out some task. I

  • 0

I have a program where a bunch of threads carry out some task. I want to know when all these threads are finished so that I can do some other stuff with their results. I don’t want to use things like Thread.join. What I prefer is another thread checking on all these threads and when it sees that they are finished, it carries out some special task. Any ideas about how this can be done ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T04:52:31+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 4:52 am

    Actually blocking is much easier to implement, more reliable and does not introduce any extra overhead/latency. If you don’t want to use join(), consider CountDownLatch, which allows you to wait for a set of threads.

    Another, much more pleasant approach is ExecutorService wrapped with lightweight ExecutorCompletionService.

    Both approaches can be used in a non-blocking fashion, e.g. only peeking rather than blocking and waiting for a result. But in order not to waste CPU cycles, have a separate background thread blocking and waiting for a result and sending some event immediately when all worker threads are done.

    Alternatively let each worker thread send an event when it’s done. The object that receives these events will know the processing is done once the number of received events reaches the number of workers started. With ListenableFuture from Guava you can even avoid extra watchdog thread.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm working a program that will have a bunch of threads processing data. Each
I have a script that creates a bunch of threads, runs a program to
i have a program which is using several threads to execute some task. Each
In my program, I've got a bunch of classes that will only ever have
I have program, that must interact with a console program before my program can
I have program that runs fast enough. I want to see the number of
I have a program that reads a bunch of text and analyzes it. The
I have a program that creates a bunch of movie files. I runs as
I have program that requires Python 3, but I develop Django and it uses
I have program that has a variable that should never change. However, somehow, it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.