Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7175469
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T16:18:08+00:00 2026-05-28T16:18:08+00:00

I have a program where I allocate multiple buffers as a part of a

  • 0

I have a program where I allocate multiple buffers as a part of a receive queue to receive messages from a port (UDP protocol). Currently the buffers are not contiguous, but now I am considering making them contiguous so that I can easily patch them together if need be. Is it any less reliable/fast to request 1 large block of memory as opposed to repeatedly allocating smaller blocks.

The total size I’m looking at is 1000 2KB buffers, so 2MB.

And please, don’t tell me I should use TCP; if I could I would.

By the way I’m using c++ and compiling with VS2005.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T16:18:09+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 4:18 pm

    Allocating a large block is generally faster than allocating multiple small blocks. Each allocation has an overhead, so with one large allocation you pay the overhead once instead of many times.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a C++ program which, during execution, will allocate about 3-8Gb of memory
I have a program that uses the mt19937 random number generator from boost::random. I
Let's say I have a program(C++, for example) that allocates multiple objects, never bigger
So i have this C++ program that is called via JNI from my Java
I have a problem with an application I'm currently developing. In this program I
I have simple OpenGL C program (from NeHe lesson 2 ). There is initialization
I have a multi threaded application where I allocate buffers with data, which then
Sometimes when I program for the iPhone, I wonder when you have to allocate
I have a CC 1.1 card and my program entails me to dynamically allocate
I have program that has a variable that should never change. However, somehow, it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.