Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 515621
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:38:49+00:00 2026-05-13T07:38:49+00:00

I have a query that I have made into a MYSQL view. This particular

  • 0

I have a query that I have made into a MYSQL view. This particular view is central to our application so we are looking at tuning it. There is a primary key on Map_Id,User_No,X,Y. I am pretty comfortable tuning SQL server queries but not totally sure about how MySql works in this aspect. Would it help to put an index on it that covers points and update_stamp as well? Reads on this table are 90% so while it has lots of inserts, it does not compare to the amount of reads.

Description: Get the person with the most points for each x,y coord in a given map. Tie break by who has the latest update stamp and then by user id.

    SELECT GP.Map_Id AS Map_Id,GP.User_No AS User_No,GP.X AS X,GP.Y AS Y, GP.Points AS Points,GP.Update_Stamp AS Update_Stamp
    FROM (Grid_Points GP LEFT JOIN Grid_Points GP2
         ON (
       (
        (GP2.Map_Id = GP.Map_Id) AND (GP2.X = GP.X) AND (GP2.Y = GP.Y) AND 
        ((GP2.Points > GP.Points) OR ((GP2.Points = GP.Points) AND (GP2.Update_Stamp > GP.Update_Stamp)) OR 
        ((GP2.Points = GP.Points) AND (GP2.Update_Stamp = GP.Update_Stamp) AND (GP2.User_No < GP.User_No)))
       )
  )
 )

WHERE ISNULL(GP2.User_No);
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:38:50+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:38 am

    Wow man, you really like to use parentheses. 🙂

    You’re right, a compound index may help. You might even be able to make it a covering index. Probably either an index on Grid_Points(Map_Id,X,Y) or else an index on Grid_Points(Points,Update_Stamp,User_No) would be what I try.

    Always test query optimization with EXPLAIN to see if the optimizer is using your index. Read that documentation section until you understand the cryptic notes in the EXPLAIN report.

    The EXPLAIN report will probably show you which index it decides to use. You should be aware that MySQL uses only one index per table in a given query.

    Here’s how I would write that query, relying on order of precedence between AND and OR instead of so many nested parentheses:

    SELECT GP.Map_Id, GP.User_No, GP.X, GP.Y, GP.Points, GP.Update_Stamp
    FROM Grid_Points GP LEFT JOIN Grid_Points GP2
      ON GP2.Map_Id = GP.Map_Id AND GP2.X = GP.X AND GP2.Y = GP.Y
        AND (
          GP2.Points > GP.Points
          OR
            GP2.Points = GP.Points
            AND GP2.Update_Stamp > GP.Update_Stamp
          OR
            GP2.Points = GP.Points
            AND GP2.Update_Stamp = GP.Update_Stamp
            AND GP2.User_No < GP.User_No
        )
    WHERE GP2.User_No IS NULL;
    

    You are using my favorite method for finding greatest-n-per-group in MySQL. MySQL doesn’t optimize GROUP BY very well (it often incurs a temporary table which gets serialized to disk), so the left outer join solution that you’re using is usually a lot better, at least for MySQL. In other brands of RDBMS, this solution may not have such an advantage.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a huge query that is being made dynamically, but I want the
I have a query that is dynamically built after looking up a field list
I have a query that originally looks like this: select c.Id, c.Name, c.CountryCode, c.CustomerNumber,
I have a query that looks like this: public IList<Post> FetchLatestOrders(int pageIndex, int recordCount)
I have a query that I'm executing from a .NET application to a SQL
I have a query that is currently using a correlated subquery to return the
I have a query that has 7 inner joins (because a lot of the
I have a query that works on Postgresql 7.4 but not on Postgresql 8.3
I have a query that runs super fast when executed in the sql editor
I have a query that pulls up questions from one table and answers from

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.