Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 933515
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T20:50:48+00:00 2026-05-15T20:50:48+00:00

i have a question about basic mysql database optimisation. I have 3 tables, Articles,

  • 0

i have a question about basic mysql database optimisation.
I have 3 tables, Articles, Tags and Taggings (which is a join table).

Articles         Taggings             Tags
id               id                   id
name             article_id           name
                 tag_id

I am retrieving the articles that exactly match the tags specified, with the following query

SELECT *, COUNT(*) AS c
FROM articles AS a
JOIN taggings AS tng ON a.id = tng.article_id
JOIN tags AS t ON t.id = tng.tag_id
WHERE t.name IN ("Red","Green")
GROUP BY a.id
HAVING c = 2

This query is slow, so I did an EXPLAIN, and got the following results:

alt text http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2306276/EXPLAIN%20results.png

Now, I don’t really understand what I am doing here, but i believe that “type: ALL” is not good, so thought i would add indexes(BTREE) to both article_id and tag_id in the taggings table, and run the query again.
alt text http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2306276/EXPLAIN%20results%202.png
Well that didn’t look any better to my uneducated eye, same number of rows as previous one, and the type is still ALL in two of the cases.

So could someone tell me where I am going wrong please? will indexes not help me with this problem?

My Tag table will remain relatively small, so I thought the query should scan the Tag table for the tags I have specified, and then (through the indexes) be able to instantly retrieve the associated properties, and it should all be very quick, obviously something wrong in my thinking.

Thanks

[EDIT] – for Jay’s comments

I added 10k articles, 30k taggings, and 6 tags, also added 2 indexs on tag.name and taggings.tag_id, the query still took a long time to run, 0.5-1 second, the EXPLAIN is below.
alt text http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2306276/EXPLAIN%20results%203.png

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T20:50:49+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 8:50 pm

    Because tags.name is the only column that really reduces a number of rows in result set, it must be indexed to make any tag-based search query faster.

    Update: try to run this query

    SELECT a.*
    FROM articles AS a
    JOIN taggings AS tng ON a.id = tng.article_id
    JOIN tags AS t ON t.id = tng.tag_id
    WHERE t.name IN ("Red","Green")
    GROUP BY a.id
    HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT t.id) = 2
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 499k
  • Answers 500k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is not pretty but it works: rm -R $(ls… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Yes. Override the base1 and base2 methods in Derived to… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No, you can't. Unfortunately, UIEvent doesn't expose any public way… May 16, 2026 at 12:45 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

No related questions found

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.