Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7067591
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T05:13:15+00:00 2026-05-28T05:13:15+00:00

I have a question about Java Generics. If I define a class like this:

  • 0

I have a question about Java Generics. If I define a class like this:

public Test<String> ...

Does this mean that my class now acts like a collection type for Strings? For example when seeing it like this List I know that it is a List of Strings. Does the <> always mean it’s a collection (general meaning, not the actual Collection type)?

thanks,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T05:13:15+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 5:13 am

    No. It just means that your type is parameterized with the type String. There are plenty of non-collection generic types. See Callable<T>, Future<T>, Comparator<T> for example.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a question about the behaviour of Timer class in Java. This is
I have a Assignment question about Java Generics. The given class is Product.java. It
hello I have some question about writing class in Java, why this one is
I had a question about Java Class Path variables. If I have multiple jars
Hello i have some question about java. here is my code: public static void
I want to ask a question about Java. I have a user-defined object class,
I have a question about Java Generics and Collections. It's considered good practice to
I have a Java question about generics. I declared a generic list: List<? extends
I'd have a question here considering java generics. I have a generic class called
I have a simple question about the java classloading mechanism. I think that the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.