Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6051327
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T07:48:35+00:00 2026-05-23T07:48:35+00:00

I have a question on my mind regarding makefiles. $(OBJECTS) : OBJEC/%.o : %.c

  • 0

I have a question on my mind regarding makefiles.

$(OBJECTS) : OBJEC/%.o : %.c
        gcc -c $< -o $@

I am unable to understand this rule.

Usually, there is only one target and its dependencies in a makefile rule, but there are 2 colons in the above piece of code.

I am unable to figure out which is the target and which is the dependency.
How does the code work?

Can anyone clear it up for me?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T07:48:36+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 7:48 am

    It’s a static pattern rule. Have a look at this section of GNU make’s manual.
    Basically, it states that the pattern OBJEC/%.o : %.c only applies to the targets listed in $(OBJECTS).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a question about locking. This doesn't have to be only about record
We have the question is there a performance difference between i++ and ++i in
I have a question about best practices regarding how one should approach storing complex
I have a question regarding the two additional columns (timeCreated, timeLastUpdated) for each record
I have a question regarding a problem with L2S, Autogenerated DataContext and the use
This question is regarding migration project. Currently the legacy Application is in ColdFusion and
I have a question regarding compiling against SDK's, which I thought I understood until
My question is about memory use and objects in actionscript 2. If I have
I have a question regarding JavaScript and methods by which its code can be
another database structuring question, hope you guys dont mind :D i am having this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.