Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4061254
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T15:26:38+00:00 2026-05-20T15:26:38+00:00

I have a Rails application, I have the following DB schema: each User has

  • 0

I have a Rails application, I have the following DB schema:
each User has many Members and each Member has many Tags.
The link between the tables is direct (Members table has a user_id column and Tags has a member_id column).

What is the most efficient way to count the number of Tags associated with the user?
Is it through Rails and activerecord or pure sql?

Any thoughts/examples?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T15:26:39+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 3:26 pm

    In your Tag model you can add a scope:

    scope :count_by_user, lambda { |user|
    members.where(“members.user_id >= ?”, user)
    }

    How about that? Do you have the members function/relationship in your Tag model?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a rails application where each user has a separate database. (taking Joel
I have a Rails application that unfortunately after a request to a controller, has
I'm looking at building a Rails application which will have some pretty large tables
I have Rails 3 application (running Rails RC1), and I have the following controller:
I currently have hostingrails.com. But following their tutorial on deploying rails application with FASTCGI
I have a task to develop a rails application following the model for routing.
I have a Rails simple application that has two main models. A person model
I have the following form in my Rails application: <% form_tag password_resets_path, :id =>
I have the following structure in my rails application: class Movie < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many
I currently have the following link_to in my Rails application: <%= link_to 'Remove this

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.