Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9243105
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T08:44:07+00:00 2026-06-18T08:44:07+00:00

I have a rather large collection in mongodb with approx 100 000 documents (not

  • 0

I have a rather large collection in mongodb with approx 100 000 documents (not sharded). This is a backend for a web application that basically just allow the user to browse different ways to view the same information in this collection.

For one of the views I try to count the number of occurrences of a field using the aggregation framework. This means aggregating the entire collection. The problem is that this aggregation operation (which is a simple pipeline of group, sort and limit) takes 2 seconds which is too slow for a web application.

So my question is; what is the preferred solution in order to cache the result of this aggregation operation? As far as I have found, it is not possible to “aggregate into” a new collection, or anything like that. At the moment the only solution I have found is to read the entire result into an variable and then inserting this variable into a new collection using insert – but I fear this involves sending a lot of data from the database => to my application => back to the database?

Any suggestions?

Example of pipeline:

res = items.aggregate([
    { "$group": { "_id": { "item_id": "$item_id", "title": "$title", "category": "$category" }, "count": { "$sum": 1 } } },
    { "$sort": { "count": -1 } },
    { "$limit": 5 }
])

The schema is basically those 3 fields + a few more that is really not relevant, i.e:

doc = {
    "item_id": 1000,
    "title": "this is the item title",
    "category": "this is the item category"
}

I have tried index on both item_id and all 3 fields with no success.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T08:44:09+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 8:44 am

    Aggregation returns result to one document. The result is limited by 16M. The document is returned to app.

    If you want to “aggregate” to a collection – use map-reduce.

    map_function = function () {
            emit(this.item_id, {"item_id": this.item_id, /* any other info */ "count": 1});
    };
    
    reduce_function = function (key, values) {
            var result = {"item_id": key, /* any other info should be given from one or any of values array objects */ "count": 0};
            values.forEach(function (value) {
                    result["count"] += value["count"];
            });
            return result;
    };
    

    Not sure whether you can emit structural values – please try. BTW emitting key field is good.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have a rather large and complex application written in Java which is running
I have a rather large amount of data (100 MB or so), that I
I have a rather large application that has literally a hundred DDLs with Yes
How do I pull a spring bean manually? I have a rather large web
I have a rather large solution in VS 2008. It contains 3 web applications
I have rather large project that uses ICU regex classes. Basically it might run
I have a rather large text corpus, of which I would like to check
I have a rather large SQL file which starts with the byte order marker
I have a rather large diff of 2 GIT branches and would like to
I have a rather large database that has alot of decimal columns in alot

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.