Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 575789
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:58:40+00:00 2026-05-13T13:58:40+00:00

I have a rather large set of javascript functions that I am working on

  • 0

I have a rather large set of javascript functions that I am working on refactoring into a set of classes using Prototype.

I was wondering if there was a way I could make binding anonymous functions to the class simpler? I keep forgetting to add the bind this at the end. Or is this just the way it is done all the time?

 var arr = this.getSomeArray();
 arr.each(function(t) {
     t.update(val);
     this.updateJSValue(t);
 }.bind(this));
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:58:40+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:58 pm

    Your options are basically to call some function (bind, addMethods or another function you write) or use a local variable rather than this:

    var self=this;
    arr.each(function(t) {
         t.update(val);
         self.updateJSValue(t);
    });
    

    If you’ve a large number of functions, the local variable requires the least typing For just a few functions, there isn’t too much difference.

    function ThingMixin(self) {
        self.foo = function(arr) {
            arr.each(function(t) {
                 t.update(val);
                 self.updateJSValue(t);
            });
        };
        ...
    };
    ...
    ThingMixin(Ralph.prototype);
    
    // or an anonymous function:
    (function (self){
        self.foo = function(arr) {
            arr.each(function(t) {
                 t.update(val);
                 self.updateJSValue(t);
            });
        };
        ...
    })(Ralph.prototype);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 290k
  • Answers 290k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You can do this with generics and a utility class… May 13, 2026 at 5:42 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Split a search string in a words array and then… May 13, 2026 at 5:42 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your using colspan incorrectly. You could try something like: <TABLE… May 13, 2026 at 5:42 pm

Related Questions

I'm building a set of SVG files that include an unfortunate number of hardcoded
What is a good way to implement Gaussian elimination when the operators are custom
I'm trying to build a quick overview that shows the upcoming calendar week. I
I am attempting to develop a service that contains numerous client and server sockets
I have a rather large DBML file and recently discovered that Visual Studio's MSLinqToSQLGenerator

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.