Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8793875
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T23:10:43+00:00 2026-06-13T23:10:43+00:00

I have a rather simplistic example that I would like to learn the best

  • 0

I have a rather simplistic example that I would like to learn the best possible solution for. I have a data set:

depth = [0:0.5:20];

I want to only select ‘depth’ from a specific range, for example from 2 to 5. I can do this by:

d1 = find(depth == 2,1,'first');
d2 = find(depth == 5,1,'first');
depth = depth(d1:d2);

Is there an alternative, cleaner way of doing this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T23:10:43+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 11:10 pm

    just use logical indexing:

     depth(depth >= 2 & depth <= 5)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a rather large text corpus, of which I would like to check
I accidentally deleted some builds for a job that I would have rather kept.
I have a rather large(not too large but possibly 50+) set of conditions that
I have rather large project that uses ICU regex classes. Basically it might run
I have some rather odd behavior in my D program that I've narrowed down
I have a rather enormous project in which I'm trying to retrofit in-memory data.
I have a rather huge query that is needed in several stored procedures, and
I have a question regarding implementation of smart-search features. For example, consider something like
I have a rather small part of my webpage that uses a definition list
I have a rather complex query that pretty much mimics a test query I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.