Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8318279
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T21:54:37+00:00 2026-06-08T21:54:37+00:00

I have a rather verbose object with a lot of properties which I use

  • 0

I have a rather verbose object with a lot of properties which I use to transport data to a SQL database. I would now like to provide a “light” version of this object that only uses some properties of the verbose one.

I’m using the light objects to provide through a REST api, and the verbose ones to transport the data, so ideally I could reverse the process as well (overwriting properties of verbose object with existing properties of light object, then save to database).

All these properties will have the same data types, as long as they exist in the light object.

Simple example:

class Verbose {
  public string email;
  public Guid id;
}

class Simple {
  public string email;
  // don't show Guid
}

Now I want to transform all objects of type Verbose to type Simple, ditching all unnecessary properties – is there a simple way to do this?

Ideally this should be reversible as well.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T21:54:39+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 9:54 pm

    You can write a constructor that takes a verbose object
    and vice versa.

    public Verbose(Simple simple)
    {
        this.id = Guid.NewGuid();
        this.email = simple.email;
    }
    
    public Simple(Verbose verbose)
    {
        this.email = verbose.email;
    }
    

    That way, you have all the conversion in one place,
    at least each conversion direction.

    This question here might be of interest for you:
    How to write a converter class? How to efficiently write mapping rules?

    EDIT AS IMPORTANT TO OP

    Verbose => Simple

    If Simple is a subset of Verbose, just derive Verbose from Simple.
    no conversion needed here.

    Verbose IS a Simple then.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a rather large text corpus, of which I would like to check
I have a rather enormous project in which I'm trying to retrofit in-memory data.
I have a rather large SQL file which starts with the byte order marker
I have rather simple task and I would like to ask you for recommendation.
Have a rather simple question. Does anyone knows if i can use jparallax both
OK, this one is rather complicated to explain, which explains the verbose title: In
I have an object which I have created from an XML document using visual
For the one millionth time, I would have liked to use an IN operator
I have a collection containing a LOT of Data Transfer Objects that I need
I have a situation where I would like to be able to rate a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.