Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 160691
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T11:04:48+00:00 2026-05-11T11:04:48+00:00

I have a read-only database, so I am turning off ObjectTracking (thus implicitly turning

  • 0

I have a read-only database, so I am turning off ObjectTracking (thus implicitly turning off DeferredLoading).

I wish to do lazy loading and not use LoadWith<>.

What is the simplest way to explicitly tell Linq to go and lazy fetch a relation just before I need the data itself.

For example: a simple dbml alt text

If I have the following code:

  TestDbDataContext context = new TestDbDataContext(Settings.Default.TestersConnectionString);   context.ObjectTrackingEnabled = false;    var result = context.Employees.ToList();   foreach (var employee in result)   {     // HERE Should load gift list     foreach (var gift in employee.Gifts)     {       Console.WriteLine(gift.Name);     }   } 

I know I can write a full query again, but I hope we can find together a better way.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T11:04:48+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:04 am

    You are fighting the system… 2 thoughts:

    • if you know you need the other data (nested foreach), why wouldn’t you want to use LoadWith? That is pretty-much the text-book use case
    • since you (from post) know that object tracking is required for lazy loading, why not just enable object tracking; data-contexts should usually be considered ‘units of work’ (i.e. short-lived), so this isn’t likely to hurt much in reality.

    See the official replies here for why these two options (object tracking and deferred loading) are linked.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 94k
  • Answers 94k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The area is the difference of the outer and inner… May 11, 2026 at 6:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's code that is directly tied to the controls of… May 11, 2026 at 6:50 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There's no way of getting Intellisense to automatically write the… May 11, 2026 at 6:50 pm

Related Questions

I am building application that required some data from iPhone's Call log(read only). The
I may be going about this backwards... I have a class which is like
I have a database with one table, like so: UserID (int), MovieID (int), Rating
I'm about to start a new project which should have a rather large database.

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.