Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4027528
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T11:06:27+00:00 2026-05-20T11:06:27+00:00

I have a reference model, (for example a triangle), with its ‘up’ vector definied

  • 0

I have a reference model, (for example a triangle), with its ‘up’ vector definied as <0 1 0> and its ‘over’ vector defined as <1 0 0>.

Now I have another triangle of the same size rotated and positioned arbitrarily in a 3d space. What I want to do is to find out this new triangle’s ‘up’ and ‘over’ vector. I.e. if the triangle is rotated 180 degrees around the X-axis, it’s ‘up’ vector should be <0 -1 0> and its ‘over’ vector should be the same.

How do I find the rotation transformation? If I have this, I can just ‘rotate’ the ‘up’ vector by the inverse to get the new ‘up’ vector and then I’m done.

Any ideas?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T11:06:28+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 11:06 am

    Ok everyone. Thanks for the help, but I managed to figure it out.

    Here are the steps.

    1. Center both objects at the origin

    2. Rotate one vector onto another, for examble (a0) -> (b0). Now you have to vectors overlapping one another. a0/b0, although points, form vectors from the origin

    3. Find the normals of each of these vectors, this can be done by using an additional point in each coordinate space and finding the cross products. For example:

      an = a0 x a1
      bn = b0 x b1

    4. Now just rotate an onto bn and you are finished.

    The easiest way to do the rotations is to add a ‘rotateTo’ member function that returns a quaternion (Avoids gimbal lock). Then you can multiply the two quaternions together to get the resulting rotation transformation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The GoDiagram object model has a GoDocument. GoViews have a reference to a GoDocument.
I often have a class defined and I also define another class that is
I have a reference to a type, for which I would like to retrieve
I have a reference-type variable that is readonly , because the reference never change,
I have a 'reference' SQL Server 2005 database that is used as our global
Does anybody have any reference material that details Cauchy-Reed algorithm? Googling for Cauchy-Reed Solomon
I would like to have a reference for the pros and cons of using
I have a WCF service that I have to reference from a .net 2.0
Why is it impossible to have a reference to void? The only thing I
After I call getpwuid(uid) , I have a reference to a pointer. Should I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.