Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3456144
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:42:01+00:00 2026-05-18T09:42:01+00:00

I have a regex but it is very big. I specify the set of

  • 0

I have a regex but it is very big. I specify the set of chars that I allow.
That makes it big regex expression. Will it be simpler if I can specify the opposite i.e. just specify what chars I won’t accept?

^[^\|\^~]*$

But it is not working. Any clue?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:42:01+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:42 am

    This matches strings that do not contain those three characters anywhere:

    ^[^|^~]*$
    

    While this matches all strings that contain any of those three anywhere:

    [|^~]
    

    The two patterns are equivalent, so you could either use the first one, or use the second one with negation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this regex working but now need to allow numbers without the decimal
I have a regex to match URLs. It matches very well for anything that
I need to learn RegEx but don't have time to figure this out right
Hi have this URL string which I need to extract possibly using regex but
I have used the excellent gskinner.com/RegExr/ tool to test my string matching regex but
I have the following regex date validator but it is allowing the following date:
I have the regex to validate uk phone numbers but it is currently forcing
I have a javascript regex which validates UK postcodes. It works well, but it
I have this: var blockRegEx = new Regex((proc sql;)(.*?)(quit;), RegexOptions.IgnoreCase | RegexOptions.Multiline); but it
I have this data: /blabla/blabla (abs,def) /yxz I use this regex (.*)(?:\(([^$]*)\))?\n But it

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.