Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6025645
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T04:19:50+00:00 2026-05-23T04:19:50+00:00

I have a regex \[\[(.+)\]\] . I use it to capture wikilinks like hey

  • 0

I have a regex \[\[(.+)\]\]. I use it to capture wikilinks like hey I [[am]] so awesome (captures am). How could I modify this so that hey I [[am]] more [[awesome]] than you think yields both am and awesome, separately? My attempts have yielded single strings like am]] more [[awesome. A little context: I’m using this to write a Ruby IRC bot.

P.S. Wikilinks can also be multi-word, like hey I am much [[more awesome]] than you [[probably think]].

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T04:19:51+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 4:19 am

    You need to make the .+ non-greedy:

    \[\[(.+?)\]\]
    

    See this reference: ruby regexen.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does anyone use have a good regex library that they like to use? Most
I have a regex 'simple' that I'd like to use as a building block
Possible Duplicate: Escape string for use in Javascript regex I have a msg like
I have a string something like [aaa][vad][adf], i would like to use regex to
A tutorial I have on Regex in python explains how to use the re
I'm just beginning to use Regex so bear with my terminology. I have a
I have a regex that is going to end up being a bit long
I have a regex call that I need help with. I haven't posted my
I have this regex I built and tested in regex buddy. _ [ 0-9]{10}+
I have a RegEx that is working for me but I don't know WHY

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.