Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3284698
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T20:11:01+00:00 2026-05-17T20:11:01+00:00

I have a regex that I thought was working correctly until now. I need

  • 0

I have a regex that I thought was working correctly until now. I need to match on an optional character. It may be there or it may not.

Here are two strings. The top string is matched while the lower is not. The absence of a single letter in the lower string is what is making it fail.

I’d like to get the single letter after the starting 5 digits if it’s there and if not, continue getting the rest of the string. This letter can be A-Z.

If I remove ([A-Z]{1}) +.*? + from the regex, it will match everything I need except the letter but it’s kind of important.

20000      K               Q511195DREWBT            E00078748521
30000                      K601220PLOPOH            Z00054878524

Here is the regex I’m using.

/^([0-9]{5})+.*? ([A-Z]{1}) +.*? +([A-Z]{1})([0-9]{3})([0-9]{3})([A-Z]{3})([A-Z]{3}) +([A-Z])[0-9]{3}([0-9]{4})([0-9]{2})([0-9]{2})/
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T20:11:01+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 8:11 pm

    Use

    [A-Z]?
    

    to make the letter optional. {1} is redundant. (Of course you could also write [A-Z]{0,1} which would mean the same, but that’s what the ? is there for.)

    You could improve your regex to

    ^([0-9]{5})+\s+([A-Z]?)\s+([A-Z])([0-9]{3})([0-9]{3})([A-Z]{3})([A-Z]{3})\s+([A-Z])[0-9]{3}([0-9]{4})([0-9]{2})([0-9]{2})
    

    And, since in most regex dialects, \d is the same as [0-9]:

    ^(\d{5})+\s+([A-Z]?)\s+([A-Z])(\d{3})(\d{3})([A-Z]{3})([A-Z]{3})\s+([A-Z])\d{3}(\d{4})(\d{2})(\d{2})
    

    But: do you really need 11 separate capturing groups? And if so, why don’t you capture the fourth-to-last group of digits?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need a Regex that will match a java method declaration. I have come
I have a RegEx that is working for me but I don't know WHY
I have a regex call that I need help with. I haven't posted my
I have a regex that is going to end up being a bit long
Ok so I have this regex that I created and it works fine in
Does anyone use have a good regex library that they like to use? Most
I have this simple regex, [\d]{1,5} that matches any integer between 0 and 99999.
In Python compiled regex patterns have a findall method that does the following: Return
i have a list of regex patterns (stored in a list type) that I
To outline: I have a parser that grabs Cell references using the following regex

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.