Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6895987
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T06:58:39+00:00 2026-05-27T06:58:39+00:00

I have a relatively large table (81M rows) and an index on it. I

  • 0

I have a relatively large table (81M rows) and an index on it.

I want to add a column to the existing index.

I searched for it on Google, but I couldn’t find a way for it.

I’ve read somewhere that the only way to add a column to an index is to drop and recreate it.

However, here it says it’s common practice to add columns to existing index. (Although the author doesn’t recommend it.)

So, is it possible to add columns to existing index and if possible is it good practice?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T06:58:40+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:58 am

    It is not possible to add a new column to an existing index without dropping and recreating the index.

    When Jonathan Lewis is talking about “adding a column to an existing index”, he’s talking about dropping the existing index and creating a new index. Note in his example, both the “original index” and “modified index” are listed with a CREATE INDEX statement. There are no ALTER INDEX statements in the example that would add a new column without dropping the old column.

    Whether it is a good idea to drop & recreate the index with an additional column depends on a number of factors. As Jonathan Lewis points out, there are various situations where adding additional columns will affect the clustering factor of the index and cause some existing queries to perform more poorly. Without knowing anything about your system or the index we’re talking about, it’s impossible to advise.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a relatively large database tables (just under a million rows) that has
I have this relatively large table in a separate filegroup (2 GB, well, it's
I have a relatively large database (130.000+ rows) of weather data, which is accumulating
I have a really large table (around 32 columns and 1000+ rows) which I'm
The following two statements both have negligible execution times over a relatively large table.
I have a large table foo_large and a relatively small (a few hundred thousand
I have a need to run a relatively large number of virtual machines on
Working with a relatively large data set I have a situation where I need
I have a relatively large dataset of items (a few thousand items) that I
We are using SQL Server 2008 Enterprise version. We have a large table FooTable

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.