Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1074069
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T21:04:28+00:00 2026-05-16T21:04:28+00:00

I have a requirement where a screen allows and end user to create a

  • 0

I have a requirement where a screen allows and end user to create a filter that is basically any valid sql fragment. For reasons beyond my control this is what is needed so I need to work within this boundary.

This sql fragment gets appended to a where clause in a sql statement.Currently to avoid anything to nasty going on the login that runs the sql is limited to select operations on the required tables.

Is there any way in Rails (2.3) that I can mitigate any risk of sql injection attacks but still allow free text input so very complex filter criteria can be specified?

Cheers

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T21:04:28+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 9:04 pm

    Add second connection with deny all access policy with read only access granted to specific database and choosen tables or views of tables without sensitive columns. View names can be same as table names if you introduce separate schema. Of course your DBMS must support all these features. Once you do it well DB will take care of all security.

    Security by syntax is very hard to guarantee – depends on database SQL syntax features (and bugs) as databases have their own sqlinjection tricks. Also it is hard to properly detect what is wrong by simple parser eg.: [DELETE FROM] but [SELECT * FROM X WHERE name LIKE “%delete from our records%”] – finally it would be easier to implement simple ala-SQL-DSL parser and translate AST to SQL with escaping of non token items. But still very complex and with risk.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.