Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9021007
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 16, 20262026-06-16T05:09:19+00:00 2026-06-16T05:09:19+00:00

I have a Ruby class class MyClass attr_writer :item1, :item2 end my_array = get_array_of_my_class()

  • 0

I have a Ruby class

class MyClass
  attr_writer :item1, :item2
end

my_array = get_array_of_my_class() #my_array is an array of MyClass
unique_array_of_item1 = []

I want to push MyClass#item1 to unique_array_of_item1, but only if unique_array_of_item1 doesn’t contain that item1 yet. There is a simple solution I know: just iterate through my_array and check if unique_array_of_item1 already contains the current item1 or not.

Is there any more efficient solution?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-16T05:09:20+00:00Added an answer on June 16, 2026 at 5:09 am

    You can use Set instead of Array.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following Ruby code: module MyModule class MyClass def self.my_method end end
Let's say I have a Ruby class: class MyClass def self.property return someVal end
I have a ruby file as follows: module Example class Myclass def t_st Hello
I have a Ruby class called LibraryItem . I want to associate with every
I want to have a ruby class where all methods I require, that are
Suppose you have the following Ruby classes: class A def self.greet puts 'hi' end
I learning ruby singletons and have misunderstanding with such code: class MyClass def self.class_singleton_mymethod
I have this ruby class with an array of links. As it is now
I have a Ruby class. I want to get an instance variable from an
I have some ruby class class MyClass include Tire::Model::Persistence attr_accessor :date mapping do index_name

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.