Question

I have a Ruby program that loads up two very large yaml files, so I can get some speed-up by taking advantage of the multiple cores by forking off some processes. I’ve tried looking, but I’m having trouble figuring how, or even if, I can share variables in different processes.

The following code is what I currently have:

@proteins = ""
@decoyProteins = "" 

fork do
  @proteins = YAML.load_file(database)
  exit
end

fork do
  @decoyProteins = YAML.load_file(database)
  exit
end

p @proteins["LVDK"]

P displays nil though because of the fork.

So is it possible to have the forked processes share the variables? And if so, how?

Answer 1

One problem is you need to use Process.wait to wait for your forked processes to complete. The other is that you can’t do interprocess communication through variables. To see this:

@one = nil
@two = nil
@hash = {}
pidA = fork do
    sleep 1
    @one = 1
    @hash[:one] = 1
    p [:one, @one, :hash, @hash] #=> [ :one, 1, :hash, { :one => 1 } ]
end
pidB = fork do
    sleep 2
    @two = 2
    @hash[:two] = 2
    p [:two, @two, :hash, @hash] #=> [ :two, 2, :hash, { :two => 2 } ]
end
Process.wait(pidB)
Process.wait(pidA)
p [:one, @one, :two, @two, :hash, @hash] #=> [ :one, nil, :two, nil, :hash, {} ]

One way to do interprocess communication is using a pipe (IO::pipe). Open it before you fork, then have each side of the fork close one end of the pipe.

From ri IO::pipe:

    rd, wr = IO.pipe

    if fork
      wr.close
      puts "Parent got: <#{rd.read}>"
      rd.close
      Process.wait
    else
      rd.close
      puts "Sending message to parent"
      wr.write "Hi Dad"
      wr.close
    end

 _produces:_

    Sending message to parent
    Parent got: <Hi Dad>

If you want to share variables, use threads:

@one = nil
@two = nil
@hash = {}
threadA = Thread.fork do
    sleep 1
    @one = 1
    @hash[:one] = 1
    p [:one, @one, :hash, @hash] #=> [ :one, 1, :hash, { :one => 1 } ] # (usually)
end
threadB = Thread.fork do
    sleep 2
    @two = 2
    @hash[:two] = 2
    p [:two, @two, :hash, @hash] #=> [ :two, 2, :hash, { :one => 1, :two => 2 } ] # (usually)
end
threadA.join
threadB.join
p [:one, @one, :two, @two, :hash, @hash] #=> [ :one, 1, :two, 2, :hash, { :one => 1, :two => 2 } ]

However, I’m not sure if threading will get you any gain when you’re IO bound.