Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6349431
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T21:36:52+00:00 2026-05-24T21:36:52+00:00

I have a schema which was originally set up with MyISAM. I had relationships

  • 0

I have a schema which was originally set up with MyISAM. I had relationships between tables which were not defined as foreign keys, but I would link the table with joins, etc. There were obviously no rules for cascading deletes/updates, etc…

I re-created the same DB schema with InnoDB, but this time I put the foreign keys into the create statements and defined the on update/delete rules.

I’m loading about 200,000 records into the DB with PHP from a CSV file. It was originally taking a few minutes but since I swapped to InnoDB the PHP script times out after 10 minutes with only ~7% of the CSV file processed.

I’m tempted to switch back to MyISAM without the relationships, however a better solution (if possible) would be to use MyISAM while initially populating the database and then switch back to InnoDB afterwards and let MySQL fix up the relationships. I don’t know if this is possible, but I assume that if it is, MySQL can fix up it’s own internal data structures faster than PHP insertion one-by-one.

Another thing to consider is that approximately once a year, we will need to re-load the set of 200,000 records and identify which ones have changed. It probably wouldn’t be possible to switch from one engine to the other whenever we needed to do this.

Any pointers?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T21:36:53+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 9:36 pm

    Inserting data into the database can take up a long time if you’re using one insert query per insert. It will speed up significantly when you use the format generated by mysqldump, like this:

    INSERT INTO `table` (field1, field2, field3) 
    VALUES
    (value, value, value),
    (value, value, value),
    (value, value, value);
    

    Also, if you’d like to insert it into myisam tables anyway, there’s no problem either. Just make sure your foreign key integrity is right. After you’ve inserted all data, do this for all tables:

    ALTER TABLE `table` ENGINE = innodb;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a SQL-Server 2008 database and a schema which uses foreign key constraints
I have this schema which I need to match 2 rows from user_data :
I have xsd schema file which I can't change. Here is an excerpt that
I have a table schema which is essentially a bunch of transaction info with
I have a table which have schema like this id name 1 jack 2
I have a source schema in which the address may be given either as
I have the following schema, which I use to ensure that a person's PhoneNumber
Say I have an ActiveResource which has an schema with several attributes. One of
I have a Sql Database (which I have no control over the schema) that
I have an XSD which was transformed from a RELAX NG schema with a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.