Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6702959
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T07:06:52+00:00 2026-05-26T07:06:52+00:00

i have a sequence of 3 programs that have to be launched one after

  • 0

i have a sequence of 3 programs that have to be launched one after another. I found on the web something like that wich is exactly what i whant to do :

start /wait /b First.exe
start /wait /b Second.exe
start /wait /b Third.exe

My problem is that i have 1000 sequence to launch…
So i tried

start "exemple" "start /wait /b First.exe
start /wait /b Second.exe
start /wait /b Third.exe"
start "exemple2" "start /wait /b First.exe
start /wait /b Second.exe
start /wait /b Third.exe"

I also tried

start /b First1.exe
start /wait /b Second1.exe
start /wait /b Third1.exe

start /b First2.exe
start /wait /b Second2.exe
start /wait /b Third2.exe

This is not working too…
So i do not know how to do it.

any idea?
thx 🙂

[EDIT ]

Let’s try to make it more clear

start "exemple" "start /wait /b First.exe
start /wait /b Second.exe
start /wait /b Third.exe"
start "exemple2" "start /wait /b First.exe
start /wait /b Second.exe
start /wait /b Third.exe"

This failed because the 2nd start is not recognized, it says that windows can’t find ‘start /wait /b First.exe’

start /b First1.exe
start /wait /b Second1.exe
start /wait /b Third1.exe

start /b First2.exe
start /wait /b Second2.exe
start /wait /b Third2.exe

This failed because the order is
First1.exe and Second1.exe are launched.
Then the computer wait the end of Second1.exe to launch First2.exe and Second2.exe …

The order i would like is
The computer launch First1.exe & First2.exe
Second1.exe is launched when First1.exe finished and Second2.exe is launched when First2.exe finished.

I would like to avoid using one .cmd per execution (this would be my fail solution).

I wish i’m more clear this time!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T07:06:53+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 7:06 am

    You will need one instance of cmd.exe for each sequence, in addition to the main instance. The operating system has no built-in support for sequencing processes, and cmd.exe doesn’t support threading in command files.

    You can do it like this:

     start "sequence1" cmd /c "First.exe & Second.exe & Third.exe"
     start "sequence2" cmd /c "First.exe & Second.exe & Third.exe"
     start "sequence3" cmd /c "First.exe & Second.exe & Third.exe"
     ...
    

    The only way to avoid the (fairly modest) overhead of the extra instances of cmd.exe would be to write a solution in a real programming language rather than as a batch file.

    You may also want to consider whether this is really want you want to do. Windows doesn’t typically perform very well when hundreds of processes are running simultaneously.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have two panels: one that is always visible and another that gets declared
I was wondering if this was possible... I have a sequence of variables that
I have an xts sequence of stock trade events that I want to process
I have an application that requires a sequence to be present in the database.
I have to program a little program that show a Fibonacci sequence from 1
I have to write a program that accepts a sequence of average daily temperatures
I have a long string (DNA sequence with \n at regular intervals) that I'm
I have a program that generates and outputs a sequence of simple sample math
gooday programers. I have to design a C++ program that reads a sequence of
I've seen a few programs (eg Charles Web Developer Proxy) that are able to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.