Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3453618
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T09:23:43+00:00 2026-05-18T09:23:43+00:00

I have a set class that can polymorphically hold and manage anything of type

  • 0

I have a set class that can polymorphically hold and manage anything of type Multinumber. This can be an object of type Pair, Rational, or Complex. The problem that I am running into is that this class requires dynamic memory management and in many cases, such as the function below, I don’t know what type to allocate. Since the set is type agnostic, I can’t know if I am supposed to do Multinumber* var=new Complex, Rational, or Pair. Is there any way to check the type of what I am adding first, or to store this information in another data type without the slicing effect? One function where I have this problem is this:

bool Set::addElement(Multinumber* newElement)
{
    bool success = false;
    if(isFull())
    {
        resize();
    }
    if(!isMember(newElement))
    {
        setArray[numElements] = newElement;
        numElements++;
        success = true;
    }
    return success;
}

EDIT: I am talking about situations where this is the only place that I could possibly allocate, such as when an operator+ is called and must immediately send the object here, and the calling class does not know what the type is. It happens in my code in the Set operator+ overload, since I the Set doesn’t know what it is storing.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T09:23:43+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 9:23 am

    I don’t see why you would be allocating here. But aside from that, use the virtual clone idiom.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a Hibernate mapping that looks something like this: <class name=MyEntity> <set name=scalarSet
I want to have class that can be instantiated with list, array, seq, set,
I have a class that serializes a set of objects (using XML serialization) that
I have one class that needs to grab an attribute that is set in
I have a wrapper generic class that intended to be used with a set
If I have a class that contains properties with private set and protected set
I have a c# class that has 20+ string properties. I set about a
I have a Silverlight application that is built from a set of Silverlight class
I have an immutable class with some private fields that are set during the
I have something like this set up: class CategoryPage (webapp.RequestHandler): def get(self): ** DO

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.