Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6990049
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T19:17:41+00:00 2026-05-27T19:17:41+00:00

I have a set of ranges : Range1 —- (0-10) Range2 —- (15-25) Range3

  • 0

I have a set of ranges :

Range1 —- (0-10)

Range2 —- (15-25)

Range3 —- (100-1000) and likewise.
I would like to have only the bounds stored since storing large ranges , it would be efficient.

Now I need to search for a number , say 14 . In this case, 14 is not present in any of the ranges whereas (say a number) 16 is present in one of the ranges.

I would need a function

bool search(ranges, searchvalue)
{
    if searchvalues present in any of the ranges
        return true;
    else
        return false;
}

How best can this be done ? This is strictly non-overlapping and the important criteria is that the search has to be most efficient.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T19:17:42+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 7:17 pm

    One possibility is to represent ranges as a pair of values and define a suitable comparison function. The following should consider one range less than another if its bounds are smaller and there is no overlap. As a side effect, this comparison function doesn’t let you store overlapping ranges in the set.

    To look up an integer n, it can be treated as a range [n, n]

    #include <set>
    #include <iostream>
    
    typedef std::pair<int, int> Range;
    struct RangeCompare
    {
        //overlapping ranges are considered equivalent
        bool operator()(const Range& lhv, const Range& rhv) const
        {   
            return lhv.second < rhv.first;
        } 
    };
    
    bool in_range(const std::set<Range, RangeCompare>& ranges, int value)
    {
        return ranges.find(Range(value, value)) != ranges.end();
    }
    
    int main()
    {
        std::set<Range, RangeCompare> ranges;
        ranges.insert(Range(0, 10));
        ranges.insert(Range(15, 25));
        ranges.insert(Range(100, 1000));
        std::cout << in_range(ranges, 14) << ' ' << in_range(ranges, 16) << '\n';
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a set of ranges : Range1 ---- (0-10) Range2 ---- (15-25) Range3
I have an set numeric ranges that I would like to optimize. Here's a
Let's say you have a set of ranges: 0 - 100: 'a' 0 -
T-SQL DateTime Question. I have a set of time ranges. During those time ranges
I have a set of actions that are returning time-series data with-in ranges specifiable
If I have a large set of continuous ranges ( e.g. [0..5], [10..20], [7..13],[-1..37]
I have a set of date ranges consisting of both partially and fully overlapping
I have a data set that ranges from 1 to 30,000 I want to
I have a large set of numbers, probably in the multiple gigabytes range. First
I have a range named STATE. I want to set data validation in range

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.