Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 171687
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T13:01:55+00:00 2026-05-11T13:01:55+00:00

I have a set of strings (~80 000) I can only access sequentially by

  • 0

I have a set of strings (~80 000) I can only access sequentially by the hits.Doc(int).Get(‘fieldName’) method.

List<string> idStrings = new List<string>(); int count = hits.Length(); for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {     string idString = hits.Doc(i).Get('id');     if (!idStrings.Contains(idString))         idStrings.Add(idString); } 

The strings will later on have to be int.TryParse()’d. I think there should be a faster way to do this. Any suggestions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T13:01:56+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:01 pm

    First of all, use a Hashset<string> instead of a list, the Contains method will go faster:

    int count = hits.Length(); Hashset<string> idStrings = new Hashset<string>(); 

    EDIT: You don’t have to call ‘Contains’ if you use a Hashset as it can’t contain duplicate items. Just use Add, it will automatically remove duplicate values.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a set of strings. I would like to extract a regular expression
I have a set of strings containing characters in a PHP script, I need
I have a large set of strings. I want to divide the strings into
I have sets of strings in a database. Each set will have less than
I have a numerical indexed array of strings. Another array contains a set of
I have a set of sql - queries: List<String> queries = ... queries[0] =
I have about 100,000 strings in database and I want to if there is
I have a list of about 10,000 staff members in a List<T> and I
Lets have theese objects: public class Obj1 { public string Id { get; set;
I have a list of about a hundreds unique strings in C++, I need

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.