Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 187935
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T15:54:47+00:00 2026-05-11T15:54:47+00:00

I have a simple assembly function called from a c program and I have

  • 0

I have a simple assembly function called from a c program and I have to use a instruction (FIDIV) that needs a memory operand.

Is it safe to move the value to [esp - 2] and use it in the next instruction or is it never safe to use the stack that way?

I know there are many workarounds, and I really don’t need this anymore, so now it’s just curiosity.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T15:54:48+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:54 pm

    Using an offset like that will definately expose the data to corruption any time any action on the thread needs to touch the stack again. This can occur during interrupts, APCs, context switches, exceptions, etc. What you’ll want to do instead is to actually reserve space on the stack and save a pointer to it.

    sub esp, 4        ; Allways move it 4 byte increments. x64 may need 8 bytes mov eax, esp      ; EAX points to your 4 byte buffer add esp, 4        ; Restore allocation. 

    Of course if you only need a few bytes, the push instruction is much faster

    push eax mov  eax, esp     ; EAX points to a buffer properly alligned to system  
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 115k
  • Answers 115k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Rails is the oldest and most mature of all, and… May 11, 2026 at 10:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer http://remysharp.com/2007/09/18/auto-populate-multiple-select-boxes/ is a jquery plugin using PHP and mySQL Josh May 11, 2026 at 10:23 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer My suggestion would be to use WebForms for pages that… May 11, 2026 at 10:23 pm

Related Questions

I often accidently step into code that I'm not interested in while debugging in
I'm implementing 'check' constraints that simply call a CLR function for each constrained column.
I have some code I've written in PHP for consuming our simple webservice, which
I have a problem with using a script that adds a NiceEdit toolbar to
I have been asked recently to produced the MIPS (million of instructions per second)

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.